Friday, August 23, 2024

CHAPTER 7: ERAP FALLS, GMA RISES

Former President Erap Estrada undergoes court procedure with the Sandiganbayan.
 


Go to EDSA. Rally going on…”

Or (during the days leading to the trial): “Rally going on. Go down and be counted.”

These and similar text messages (as Filipinos call them) beeped from one cellphone to another. Hundreds, then thousands, would find themselves receiving and sending the same message through their hand-held phones.

Like on cue, thousands converge at EDSA Shrine (site of what had been called People Power—but would now be referred to as People Power 1—that sent Ferdinand Marcos flying out—via helicopter—of Malacañang in 1986) within minutes of the Senate’s voting against opening of the second envelope.

Once more, the ‘Erap Resign’ trumpet blared. It was not as if, in weeks just past, the noise had dropped to yawning levels; rather it was that this time, vocal motors were revving up.

For 4 days—from 17 to 20 January 2001—street protests in Metro Manila and major cities around the country ended Erap’s reign as President of the country.

On the night of 16 January 2001, tens of thousands had massed at the EDSA Shrine, site of People Power 1. The next day, the protesters swelled to half a million at any given time. On the third day, 19 January 2001, close to a million protesters erupted in approval as the police and military brass, led by Ping Lacson and Angelo Reyes, respectively, joined them at EDSA and expressed their withdrawal of support for the Estrada government. On January 20, 2001, then Vice President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (GMA) was sworn in by Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilarion Davide as the new President of the Philippines, replacing Erap. A few hours earlier, the Supreme Court had ruled that the Office of the President was vacant. Hours later, Erap left Malacañang.

The EDSA 2 The believers

Aside from those who pressed Erap to resign via street protests (they could have numbered to a few million people, those in other major cities outside of Metro Manila included), there were analysts of note who found merit in People Power 2 (or EDSA 2) and the events that led to it.

In one of his Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI) column, Randy David, who is also a University of the Philippines sociology professor, said that the Erap impeachment trial was “one great education” for the country. He made a point about witnesses like Clarissa Ocampo (who testified that she witnessed Erap signing as Jose Velarde his bank accounts with PCI Equitable Bank), Emma Lim and former Finance Secretary Edgardo Espiritu, among many others, who “gave the concept of citizenship and patriotism, which have long eluded Filipinos.” Risking their careers and even lives, these prosecution witnesses went on record as having been prompted to testify in the trial for love of country and fellow Filipinos.

David thought that through People Power 2, Filipinos had asserted their belief in the highest ideals of justice and integrity. “It was a moral revolution,” he said.

Conrado de Quiros, another PDI columnist, wrote that “People Power 2 was no ordinary event that brought Arroyo to power, this was people power in the truest, purest, sense of the word, a people discovering and recovering through education and action their power to right wrongs and build new worlds.”

In a speech (the full text of which was published by the Manila Bulletin on 22 February 2001), delivered on receiving a “Tanglaw ng Bayan” award from the Society of Jesus, former President Cory Aquino explained, among other things, that EDSA 2 was about democracy correcting itself. Excerpts of that speech:

“Fifteen years after bloodlessly booting out a president who turned into a dictator, the Filipino people ousted a popularly elected president who succumbed to insatiable greed.

“We call this people power and see it as the activation of the sovereign clause of a democratic Constitution, which says that sovereignty resides in the people and all power comes from them.

“Once in a while, in compelling circumstances, the people feel like taking back this power. It happens when the institutions of democracy fail to deliver democratic government or when the law defeat rather than achieves its proper aim of justice.”

Recalling the impeachment trial that led to Erap’s ouster, she said:

“It was like taking a course in political science, with a major in political responsibility. Let me say that the people graduated with top honors. They threw out the President when his allies in the Senate voted to suppress the evidence.

“As if on a given signal, an outraged citizenry in the middle of the night converged at the Shrine of Our Lady of EDSA. They went to show their anger at the treachery of the eleven senators. They went to show their conviction of the President's guilt. Above all, they came to pray together for a just resolution of the crisis of government.”

Cory acknowledged that EDSA 2 had been criticized for the process it went through. And to them she suggested a re-evaluation was in order:

“They called it ‘mob rule,’ a ‘virtual coup d’etat,’ ‘undemocratic’ and ‘unconstitutional.’

“Was it mob rule? Did we preempt the Constitution?

“We gave the Constitution every chance to work; we gave the President every chance to defend himself.

“In a constitution providing for a single term for the president, the way to change him is not by waiting for him to step down at the end of his term. That is not changing; that is waiting.

“The Constitution provides for ways to remove him before the end of his term: by resignation, by leave of absence, and by impeachment. The first two depend on his sense of propriety and do not work when he has none. The third depends on the integrity of the legislature.

“Not surprisingly, the President himself recommended his own impeachment. But when he was impeached, he did everything to undermine the impeachment process by blocking the evidence.

“What then were the people to do?

“To sit back and wait for the next elections made nonsense of the constitutional provision for the removal of a president guilty of impeachable offenses. The only recourse was to enforce the impeachment in the streets after its failure in the Senate. That is what the people did.”

On portrayals of a typical conflict that pitted the rich (representing “the mob”) against the poor (representing Erap’s supporters), De Quiros dismissed the notion that EDSA 2 was devoid of analytical underpinning. He said: “The multitude that massed at EDSA--and who will continue to mass there for as long as injustice runs rife--is not possessed of an uncritical mind that can be impressed by a slogan or two, a promise or two, a trick or two.”

Erap miscalculated twice

The foregoing narrative supports the notion that Erap’s displacement happened not only because people awoke one day to find out there was a need to reclaim power from those they elected to office, but also because the guy seemed stupid from the very start, which quite simply was a candid way of saying Erap helped depose Erap.

One could tell that Erap blundered in at least two occasions. First, he appeared to have thought that a fallout with Chavit was the least risky among all possible threats to whatever stability his administration still enjoyed up to that point. And second (a word of caution here: just where he stood on the issue could solely be a reflection of the advice he got from allies he trusted), the misreading of possible reactions to the decision by majority senators to vote against the opening of the second envelope.

The straw that broke the camel’s back, as the saying goes, was, from Chavit’s perspective, Erap’s favoring Atong Ang on the Bingo 2 Balls fiasco. Aides tried to show to Erap the gravity of Chavit’s grievances and his threat to expose the president. They did not succeed; Erap, perhaps confronted with difficult choices, forgot that his now former friend had survived not only the Crisologos and Marcos, but also multiple attempts on his life, as the succeeding chapters will show. Erap’s dumping of Chavit was like dismissal of how the past predicted the future: that Chavit won over adversities then, he was likely to win a fight even against a president now.

In the middle of the night of 3 October 2000, an attempt on his life that Chavit said was an offshoot of his fallout with Erap changed the course of Philippine history in a way that nobody could have expected.       

Ernesto Maceda, former Senator and serving as Philippine Ambassador at the time of the Senate trial, reflected on what happened through his Manila Bulletin column on 13 February 2001:

“When political analysts gather, the most popular question is what brought Erap down? Asked to name 3 major reasons, the consensus shows the following:

“1. Atong Ang—After being told to lie low at the start, why did he suddenly resurface as Jai-Alai owner and Pagcor consultant? His arrogance ignited the Chavit problem.

“2. The lavish mansions—Whose fault is it? The ladies? It was the talk of the cocktail circuit.

“3. Picking a fight with FVR—Who convinced Erap this was a good thing to do? The State of the Nation salvo was a declaration of war, FVR had no choice but to fight back.”

Postmortem analysts could add at least three stinging blows that knocked Erap out of Malacañang, viz:

1) Erap being Erap;

2) The “mob;” and

3) Text messaging.

Randy David described Erap and his leadership as incompetent, stupid, ignorant, boozing, womanizing, corrupt, and fool.[1] That Erap was therefore bound to self-destruct was not a question of why, but rather a matter of when.

The government became easy target for plotters.

The Washington Post quoted retired Air Force General Ed Abenina as saying: “The Filipino people like to call it ‘people power,’ but in fact it was a coup. It was the overthrow of the government.”

The Los Angeles Times also quoted another military man, former Defense Secretary Fortunato Abat, who reportedly admitted that “he (Abat) has been plotting the coup for months,” long before Chavit came out with his exposē.

In other words, rumors at that time about nooses having been wrapped around Erap’s neck were, in fact, true; that Chavit was the knife that cut the rope, tightening their grip; and that the rest of the mob was the sink stone that ensured Erap would be buried deep into his political grave.

The mob in this context would best be taken to mean as an ad hoc process of destabilizing existing political order, with a view of changing leadership in national government, and under conditions that undermined established constitutional and legal procedures. Movers behind this mob, according to observers, would include the Makati businessmen, a partisan public, the young, the rich and the restless—all supporting the military and the forces of then Vice President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

And let not this heretofore unknown political player be forgotten—text messaging.  

Revolt of the middle class

In 2001, cellphones were already popular and must-have luxuries in the Philippines. Unlike today (2017), however, only the relatively well-off among a population of roughly 77 million could afford to buy a cell phone. That is why EDSA2 (also called People Power 2) is sometimes referred to as revolt of the middle class. The typical profile of a protester would be that of a young career person, wearing t-shirts and jeans, pounding on the keyboards of a cellphone.

Pundits at the time joked about how revolutionaries kept themselves up to the task. Then, the advice was “keep your powder dry.” Now, they exhorted to “keep your cellphones charged.”

Writing for The Independent London, Richard Parry wrote in a 20 January 2001 article:

“The demonstrators at the Edsa Shrine had all the traditional accoutrements of protesters throughout history--flags, banners bearing wittily offensive slogans, whistles and klaxons. But the most characteristic image of People Power 2 was that of a young Filipino in T-shirt and jeans, frowning down—not speaking—into a phone.

“‘This is my second revolution, and it's been so much better than the first,’ said one middle-aged lady on Saturday, just after the jubilant announcement that Mr Estrada was leaving the Malacañang presidential palace. ‘Faster, more spontaneous, and a younger crowd. And it wouldn't have happened without those things.’

“For hours at a time, the networks were overloaded with the text traffic. The television stations reported the latest messages as news. Early yesterday morning, Mr Estrada's respected vice-president, Gloria Macapagal, arrived at the palace for her first working day as his successor.”

Even before that fateful night of 16 January 2001, text messaging had been an x-factor for the anti-Erap campaign.

An article by Michael Zielenziger on 10 December 2000 (or 3 days since the impeachment trial began), titled “Cell phones play key role in Estrada impeachment,” for the Knight Ridder Newspapers/Tribune News Service, is re-printed below:

“MANILA, Philippines—While famous Filipinos delivered fiery verbal assaults last week against embattled President Joseph Estrada at a giant bay-front rally, Ellen Santiago had no hands free to applaud. Her thumbs were too busy ‘texting.’

“Like thousands of others in the crowd, Santiago glanced up only occasionally as former President Corazon Aquino and the city's powerful Roman Catholic archbishop, Jaime Cardinal Sin, demanded Estrada's resignation. Instead of cheering, she stared down at her cell phone and jammed away with her thumbs as she received and sent tiny electronic messages— ‘texting,’ as Filipinos call it.

“‘It's a little embarrassing that I'm texting so much,’ admitted Santiago, who works for a real estate investment company. Then her phone beeped again to signal the arrival of yet another mini mailgram. ‘I have friends somewhere in this rally, and we're trying to find each other.’ 

“While Americans might be glued to cable news channels to watch the latest developments in the presidential vote, Filipinos are staring at their phones. Lounging in coffee houses and hotel lobbies or marching against Estrada, Manila's young middle-class has made wireless text-messaging the cutting-edge way to trade political gossip, debate strategy or tell jokes as the movement to oust Estrada gains momentum.

“This new technology is having a huge impact. The speed and ‘cycle-time’ that text messaging brings to political discussion has accelerated political debate and exacerbated the crisis of legitimacy Estrada now faces, analysts said.

“‘Text messaging explains the swiftness with which consensus formed within the mobile phone possessing classes against the president,’ said Alex Magno, a political analyst and a professor of sociology at the University of the Philippines. ‘Before it took us eight weeks just to set up and coordinate a single national protest action. This Estrada corruption scandal broke just eight weeks ago, and already he’s been impeached and put on trial.’

“‘The information just moves very quickly now,’ Magno added. ‘The text messages telescope the time needed to create a middle-class consensus.’ 

“The Philippines, home to both the ‘Love Bug’ computer virus and its antidote, is an English-speaking nation that has been captured by the information technology craze.

“Some Filipinos use cell phones merely to set up social meetings. But savvy organizers trade investigative tips as they fan out around the city trying to collect more evidence against Estrada, who is charged with siphoning off gambling proceeds and raking in nearly $12 million from a government tax on tobacco. His corruption trial—the first impeachment case ever launched against an Asian head of state—began last Thursday.

“‘Messaging has become a very important tool in organizing people and planning marches,’ said Arnel Galgo, a labor organizer who uses the text-messaging system to help plan anti-Estrada demonstrations and set up strategy sessions. ‘It has a real multiplier effect when you want to spread the word, and it’s much cheaper than using the phone,’ he said.

“‘I don't think Estrada realizes the brigades are actually the e-groups,’ Magno said.

Text messaging allows a cell-phone user to paw at the tiny keypad on the phone to type in a short message and dispatch it to one or dozens of other cell phone users. Though typing is usually done with the thumbs, the generation of 20-year-olds that grew up with video games seems to have little difficulty generating three or four messages in a minute by pounding furiously on their keyboards.

“While a cell phone call can cost as much as 8 pesos (1.6 cents) per minute, sending a text message often costs only 1 peso. Some phone providers offer text messaging for free as an incentive to sign up for phone service, although no one seemed to anticipate its potentially subversive uses.

Pollster Felipe Miranda said the text messaging revolution also demonstrates how a serious digital divide has emerged in the Philippines—and says the pro-Estrada's forces have failed to appreciate the rising potency of those who wield cell phones.

“‘Right now, it's the most important organizing tool, and the Malacañang (presidential) Palace doesn't appreciate how powerful it has become,’ Miranda said. ‘The opposition is much more wired, much more connected, and this makes them much more formidable at recruiting supporters and organizing protests. It allows them to pursue their causes much more effectively’ in a poor country where a home computer is still a rare luxury.

“The Estrada forces, by contrast, haven't crossed the digital divide. ‘You won't find e-mail used effectively by the Erap camp,’ Miranda said. ‘They don’t have interesting Web sites. I don’t think they understand it.’

“‘This digital divide along class lines—the cell phone is not for the poor man, Miranda said—also explains why Estrada remains popular among the nation’s peasants while the middle and upper classes have decided he must go. Miranda’s Asia Pulse poll, released just before the trial started, found that while nearly 50 percent of those with a college degree want to oust the president, only 20 percent of those with only an elementary school education want him to quit.

“The gusher of information that bombards cell phone users such as Santiago is one reason for the gap. A junior manager who doesn’t consider herself a political activist, the 34-year-old said she receives about 80 text-messages per day, many of them greetings or invitations to meet with friends.

“Tito Osias, however, uses the cell phone as his chief political weapon. An anti-Estrada activist, he uses his phone to help gather dirt on the embattled president.

“‘Here, let me show you the message I just got,’ Osias said, handing over his slim, silver Nokia phone. The message reads: ‘Erap gets kickbacks each time the government releases money to Veterans Bank through director Pilarcia Ejercito, Erap’s sister.’ 

“Osias then sends a text-message to a friend familiar with Manila's banking industry, asking his source to confirm that the president’s sister is a director of Veterans Bank. Within 45 minutes a terse reply comes back: ‘Pilarcia director of PVB confirmed.’

“‘We now have 4 million cell phones in the country, and each one is a receiver and a transmitter of information,’ said Magno, the sociologist. ‘That’s why there is such a disparity in attitudes between the digitally enabled and the digitally disabled. The consensus against the president was first formed in multimedia’ and by the middle class, he added. ‘Eventually, the normal people and the mainstream media will catch up.’

“The only problem with the new technology, organizers said, is that text messaging can also circulate bad rumors, a development that would not surprise any Internet user. ‘It’s definitely helpful,’ says Risa Hontiveros, who helps organize anti-Estrada protests for an umbrella movement of social causes. ‘But sometimes you spend a lot of time telling people the texts they’re getting just aren’t true.’

Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s article on the same date for Washington Post, titled “Philippine Activism, At Push of a Button; Technology Used to Spur Political Change,” brought more of the same sight to the fore, portions of which are re-printed below:

At 11 a.m. on a recent workday, Christina Bautista picked up her sleek, gray Nokia mobile telephone to help organize a protest calling for the resignation of Philippine President Joseph Estrada. But instead of making calls, she composed a short text message on the tiny rubber keypad.

“‘Rally at noon,’ she wrote. ‘Go down and be counted.’

“Then, by pecking a few buttons, Bautista zapped her exhortation to dozens of friends who work in nearby high-rise office buildings. Within minutes, almost all of the recipients were punching keys on their phones to forward the note to their friends, who in turn passed it on to hundreds more people.

“An hour later, Manila’s financial district was packed with thousands of phone-toting professionals urging Estrada to step down over allegations that he pocketed almost $12 million in bribes.

“For the past two months, opposition groups have been raising the political pressure on Estrada with a combination of old-fashioned activism and new technology, using text messages sent on mobile phones to organize what people here call ‘instant protests.’

“Accelerating to Internet time something that used to take organizers weeks to plan, often-boisterous demonstrations can jell here in less than a few hours as word goes out over an informal phone tree to office workers, housewives and students.

“‘It's like pizza delivery,’ said Alex Magno. ‘You can get a rally in 30 minutes—delivered to you.’

“‘It’s an incredibly powerful tool,’ Bautista said of her phone. ‘Without it, there’s no way we could have gotten so many people together so quickly.’

“Today, Filipinos send an estimated 45 million text messages a day, more than double the entire combined volume of such messages in every other country in the world. The country of 76 million people has more mobile phones (about 4 million) than fixed-line units (about 3 million).

“Political analysts say the fast pace of demonstrations—coupled with an incessant electronic barrage of news blurbs, gossip and jokes about Estrada, all composed in 160 characters or less--has been instrumental in galvanizing broad legislative support for the president's ouster. Estrada was impeached by the House of Representatives last month, and his trial in the Senate began last Thursday.

“The protests, analysts say, have helped to speed up the impeachment process: The trial is beginning just two months after Estrada was accused of bribery. In the 1980s, Marcos was able to hang on to power for almost three years after he became widely suspected of ordering the assassination of opposition leader Benigno Aquino, the event that sparked a popular revolt against his rule. At that time, opposition leaders had to rely on mimeographed fliers and low-power ham radio transmitters clandestinely installed in cars.

“Bautista, 32, an associate in a large accounting firm who joined the opposition movement a few weeks ago, said the messaging technology has given rise not just to a new type of protest, but also to a new breed of protester.

“‘It’s a great way to get people who are in offices involved,’ she said. ‘They don’t have to spend all day protesting. They just get a message telling them when it’s starting, and then they take the elevator down to the street. They can be seen, scream a little and then go back to work.’”

Gloria and the mob

Despite what amounted to consent by the Supreme Court, the manner by which national leadership changed from Erap to GMA was assailed by some quarters, especially foreign media.

Syth Mydans of New York Times, in a 5 February 2001 article titled “‘People Power 2’ Doesn't Give Filipinos the Same Glow” in part wrote:

“Fifteen years ago, Filipinos braved tanks and threats in a “people power” revolution to bring down a dictator who had stolen an election, and to restore democracy after two decades of martial law.

“Last month, in what Filipinos are calling People Power II, huge crowds again forced a president from office. As before, it was an emotional outpouring, with songs and raised fists.

“But there were crucial differences that have cast doubt on the dedication of Filipinos to democratic processes, and to their chagrin, Filipinos have drawn not praise but censure from abroad.

“Filipinos were thrilled at the peaceful ouster of a president who had become an embarrassment—a lazy, hard-drinking womanizer who had allowed the economy to collapse and had, according to testimony in the Senate, engaged in systematic corruption.

“But if they expected cheers once again from around the world, they were instead hurt and infuriated when People Power II was met with doubt and criticism, described by foreign commentators as ‘a defeat for due process,’ as ‘mob rule,’ as ‘a de facto coup’.”

The Associated Press quoted Singapore Senior Leader Lee Kuan Yew as saying: “I don't think it was a plus for the democratic system.”

William H. Overholt, writing for International Herald Tribune, felt equally disappointed. His article on 24 January 2001 titled “It's ‘People Power’ Again, but This Time without the People,” essayed how one differed from the other:

“One of the things missing in the so-called People Power 2 movement that forced the removal of President Joseph Estrada last weekend is people power. Right up until the overthrow, the polls showed that the majority of Filipinos opposed Mr. Estrada's impeachment trial for corruption and abuse of power. People Power 1, which forced President Ferdinand Marcos to step down in 1986, was different.

“Filipinos had voted against Mr. Marcos in an election. They were angry when he fiddled the numbers and got caught. People Power 1 validated an election. People Power 2 invalidated an election.

“Mr. Estrada was elected president in 1998 with the largest vote total in Philippine history. The decisive moment 15 years ago came when demonstrations in the streets of Manila blocked the tanks and rendered the military impotent. The decisive moment in People Power 2 came when the armed forces chief of staff, General Angelo Reyes, an open supporter of Vice President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, defected with key commanders to join the opposition.

“There were a lot of demonstrations, just as in People Power 1, but this was a de facto military coup, with only broad upper- and middle-class support. The difference between what happened in the Philippines the other day and what occurred in 1986 will be a problem for Mrs. Arroyo, who was sworn in as the new president by the Supreme Court.

“The fact that Mr. Estrada did not flee into exile, as Mr. Marcos did, foreshadows difficulties to come. Mr. Marcos had to flee because he had no support. Mr. Estrada has a broad base of support. Even if he is tried for ordinary crimes and jailed, he will retain lots of support, especially among the poor masses who believe that he is being victimized by the rich and powerful because he came from their ranks and stood on their side.

“Already young military officers are expressing discontent with their chief. Already lawyers are asking questions about the way the Supreme Court was stampeded into seating the new president. The left is saying that it was right for Mr. Estrada to be forced out but unconstitutional for the new president to be installed this way.

“Such questions did not arise after the ouster of Mr. Marcos. Nobody can doubt the degree to which the evidence presented at his trial discredited Mr. Estrada. Nor can anybody doubt the moral and political culpability of the 11 senators who voted last week not to examine crucial evidence against him.

“But the legitimacy of the Philippine system rests on support for democracy. If the views of a majority don't count, then democracy doesn't count. Filipinos take their elections very seriously the poor just as much as the rich. In their eyes, rejection of Mr. Estrada's proposal for an early presidential election in May in which he would not run, however self-serving it may have been, confirmed rejection of the democratic mechanism by politicians who had equally self-serving reasons in wanting to grab the presidency without facing voters who had shown strong support for the incumbent.

“The euphoria in Manila will last for a while. But democracy and the rule of law have been weakened in the Philippines, and class struggle has been sharpened…”

And so it happened that, while GMA’s ascent to power was swift and easy--like delivering a child on the seventh month minus the labor pains--her government had to go through all sorts of strife. Like many premature babies, her reign had inborn defects.

She faced a dilemma on what to do with Erap. On the one hand, a big chunk of “the mob” demanded his punishment. On the other hand, the military brass that gave her the silver platter, so to speak, could be assumed to remain indebted to Erap. Reports at the time came out that Angelo Reyes, appointed by Erap as Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and went on to seamlessly join GMA’s cabinet as Secretary of the Department of National Defense, wanted no less than clemency for the former boss.

Concerns over stability of the Arroyo administration were not, as Overholt noted, without basis. From Day One, her government had to parry destabilization plots one after another. Her rule got so rocky that, in an attempt to placate her partisan detractors, she vowed on national TV that she would not run in the 2004 presidential elections. She however eventually did run, and won—aided, not a few charged, by massive cheating.

Rappler’s Maria Ressa chimed in with a relatively new piece, titled “#EDSA30: The Parody of People Power,” dated 26 February 2017, which brought back glimpses of what happened during those history-altering events. She said, in part:

“People Power 2 was tainted by a key difference from the first: the protests that brought Mrs. Arroyo to power deposed a duly elected president, not a dictator. That would haunt the first few months of her presidency as Estrada’s supporters tried to launch people power 3 against her on May 1, 2001, blurring the lines further between people power and mob rule. Filipino society split on economic lines: Estrada’s supporters came from the bottom rung, while Mrs Arroyo was backed by the middle and elite classes. She survived the split, but the damage was done, and she said she was forced to compromise in order to hold her unwieldy coalition together.

“Although she won her own mandate in the May 2004 elections, even that was questioned after wiretapped telephone conversations were released to the media, raising charges of election cheating, charges Mrs Arroyo denies. But those tapes triggered impeachment processes which have kept her constantly battling. This is a presidency under relentless siege.”

Erap’s mess and Gloria’s woes

Aside from the legal, political and economic issues that GMA had to resolve moving forward, Erap left the seat of power with high-profile unsolved cases. These included the Dacer -Corbito murder case and the Rizal Day bombings.

We recall that Former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Perfecto Yasay, Jr., when he testified during the Erap impeachment trial, linked the Dacer abduction to the to the stock manipulation scandal involving the gaming firm Best World (BW) Resources.

Replying to Sen. Loren Legarda-Leviste’s questions, Yasay said Dacer was about to testify before the Senate tribunal when still-unidentified armed men abducted Dacer and his driver, Manuel Corbito, along the South Superhighway in Manila on Nov. 24.

Yasay said Dante Tan, BW owner and one of Erap’s friends, tried to pressure him to clear Tan of stock manipulation charges. Yasay also disclosed that Erap offered to support him in the event Yasay would decide to run for Congress as representative of the first district of Davao City in the coming May 14, 2001 elections.

To refresh the reader’s memory on the Dacer-Corbito case, re-printed below is a timeline consolidated by www.abs-cbnnews.com:  

October 1997: Eduardo "Moonie" Lim, Jr. is president of BW Resource Corp. with 1,000 shares.

5 March 1998: Best World Construction Corp. applies for SEC registration. No exact mailing address was specified in their document.

9 March 1998: Francis A. Ablan is treasurer of BW Resource Corp. with 10,000 shares. Owen Carsi Cruz is Director of BW Resource Corp with 10,000.

8 April 1998: Dante Tan is elected by share subscribers of BW Cons. Corp. as treasurer of the corporation.

Eswaran signs affidavit that he is an alien who subscribed 40,625 shares worth P40,625.

24 April 1998: Tan deposits P61,719.00 to Bank of the Philippine Islands in behalf of Best World Cons. Corp., which is in the process of incorporation.

30 April 1998: Best World Cons. Corp.'s corporate name is certified by SEC. In the records, it says that BESTWORLD RESOURCE CORP. is the closest name.

June 1998: Joseph Ejercito Estrada takes his oath of office as President of the Philippines. Tan tells friends that he was one of the first Chinese Filipinos to have bet on Estrada's presidential bid and had been delivering funds long before May 1998. He was listed as a contributor to Estrada's presidential campaign. As soon as Estrada took his oath of office in June 1998, Pagcor signed an agreement with BW, promising to transfer its corporate offices and three casinos to Sheraton Manila, BW's planned entertainment and gaming complex in Manila. 

7 July 1998: Best World Construction Corp. is registered with the SEC.

SEC verifies the name BW Gaming and Entertainment (BWGE) Corp. unused. BWGE's name, the document says, appears to be similar to BW Resource Corp.

16 July 1998: Incorporators are Dato' Ketheeswaran (Kenneth Eswaran), Dante Tan, Joseph Victor Ejercito, Jose Salvador M. Rivera, Jr. and Francis Ablan.

Ketheeswaran, who is a Malaysian, has 40,625 shares. Tan has 40,623 shares. Rivera and Ablan have one share. JV Ejercito is the largest shareholder with 43,750 shares.

Eswanar signs affidavit that he is a foreigner with P50,000 worth shares in BWGE

Teresita Tan is treasurer of BWGE. She deposits P100,000 to Allied Bank as their corporation's paid-up capital stock.

In the document, “Foreign equity is 32.5%, with affidavit of non-registration.”

11 August 1998: BWGE Corporation is registered with SEC under the name BW Gaming and Entertainment Corp.

Dante Tan and his wife Teresita subscribed 50,000 shares, Agnes Maranan has 25,000 shares, Jose Salvador Rivera, Jr. is the largest shareholder with 75,000 and Malaysian Dato' K. Ketheeswaran (Kenneth Eswaran) with 50,000 shares are listed as incorporators and directors of BWGE.

4 November 1998: P132,861,890 worth of shares has been paid for the subscription of P150 million worth of shares.                                                           

17 November 1998: BWGE wants to add P499 million worth of capital stock to their P1 million capital stock.

17 November 1998: Breakdown of Cash Account of BWGE: 2 from Metrobank with C/A 7073504836 worth P5,000 and S/A 3076504830 worth P61,038,444.00. Also, a dollar account (2073007288) US$5,000.00, P202,500.00.

23 November 1998: BWGE's proposes the increase of their authorized capital stock by P499 million, to total P500 million, the increase in capital stock by P150 million, to total P150.25 million and a total paid-up capital is P133,111,890, an increase of P132,861,890 from the previous paid-up capital of P250,000.

December 1998: BW Gaming wins the exclusive contract to operate on-line bingo as well as to introduce Quick Pick-2, which is very similar to jueteng. Alice Reyes, chair of the Philippine Games and Amusement Corporation (PAGCOR), later told a congressional hearing that BW Gaming got the on-line bingo license because “it had the endorsement of the Office of the President.” 

15 April 1999: Gerdado Garcia is Director of BW Resource Corp. with 250,000 shares.

18 June 1999: Dante Tan owns 10% of BW Resource Corp.

30 June 1999: BW Resources signs a memorandum of agreement with PAGCOR. PAGCOR agrees to be the “anchor tenant” at the Sheraton Marina. 

BW and Best World Gaming co-borrow P600 million from the Philippine National Bank. The government, at this time, was still a major shareholder of PNB.

July 1999: The Office of the President, through PAGCOR, gave BWGE a nationwide online bingo franchise. Under the constitution, only the congress can grant franchise to operate any gambling activity. Any gambling activity not franchised by the congress is illegal.

SEC and Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) began investigations, uncovering heavy share-buying by Tan. Investigations by the SEC, PSE, and by the Philippine Senate reveals that, to jack up the price of stocks, Tan sold his shares to friends and clients at discounted rates. The transactions are reported to the PSE board which appeared to be twice the amount actually paid. This is done so stock of BW Resources will appear active. PSE and SEC found out that BW’s daily turnover circulated around 10 brokerage firms.

1 September 1999: 1,000,000 shares added to Tan's 75 million shares in BW Resoure Corp., at the same time, Garcia's shares reduced to 150,000.

8 October 1999: Stanley Ho is chairman of BW Resources with 10,000 shares.

11 October 1999: BW Resource’s stock price rose to P107 from P2, a 5,250% when news broke out that Ho is new chairman of BW Resource Corp. A week after Ho's visit to Manila, the company's share prices drop to below P30.

24 January 2000: Sen. Raul Roco, chairman of the committee on banks, financial institutions and currencies writes to Jose Yulo, Jr., President of the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) that he should submit to the committee the following documents: Printouts of broker to broker transactions on BW shares from June-October 1999, Identity of beneficial owners of BW shares in the matched transactions and exchange of letters between PSE and SEC as regards to the monitoring or investigation of BW shares.

February 2000: At a Senate investigation on the alleged insider trading in BW Resources stocks, SEC chairman Perfecto Yasay reveals that Estrada called him five times and asked to clear Dante Tan of any wrongdoing in an insider-trading scandal involving Tan’s Best World (BW) Resources. Estrada denies that he interfered. 

November 2000: Estrada is impeached by the House of Representatives. Among others, he stood accused of intervening with the duties of a public servant when he called up Yasay in relation to the BW scandal.

21 November 2000: As Estrada faced impeachment trial before the Senate and amid mounting calls for Estrada's resignation, his close friend, Caloocan Rep. “Baby” Asistio, asks publicist to politicians Salvador “Bubby” Dacer to help boost Estrada’s image.

Dacer meets with President Estada Malacañang regarding a media campaign to help his reputation.

26 November 2000: Two farmers, Alex Diloy and Jimmy Lopez, come out as eyewitnesses to the Dacer-Corbito murder case. Dacer was reportedly abducted and killed November 24. Both tell reporters that Dacer and his driver were strangled by policemen using electric cords before their corpses were set on fire.

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) prepared to indict Police Supt. Teofilo Viña, former aide of Panfilo Lacson, then PAOCTF head and Philippine National Police (PNP) chief.  Viña is reported as mastermind in the double murder and kidnapping case. 

NBI chief Reynaldo Wycoco says that they have recovered bones and teeth in a creek in Cavite. The NBI was set to examine the remains to see whether they belong to Dacer and Corbito.

Diloy and Lopez identify four Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force (PAOCTF) members to be among more than 10 individuals who took part in the killing. Lopez is also reportedly a civilian agent of PAOCTF. 

Both “eyewitnesses” are arrested by the NBI. Diloy was wearing Dacer’s white shoes when he was presented to the NBI. Lopez admits to helping build a pyre of wood and tires to set the victims on fire. Viña, head of PAOCTF Visayas, signed the permit of the seized .45 caliber pistol Lopez is carrying when seen by the NBI.

11 January 2001: Former Finance Secretary Edgardo Espiritu tells the impeachment court that Estrada owned shares in BW Resources Corp. and made a huge profit selling his shares when prices skyrocketed. Espiritu also narrates how he tried to patch up the differences between Tan and Mark Jimenez, also a close friend of Estrada, as to who would control the company.

15 January 2001: During Estrada’s impeachment trial, Yasay says the BW scandal is connected with the disappearance of Dacer, who, he claims, has knowledge of the gaming firm’s activities.

26 March 2001: Digo de Pedro, a suspect in the Dacer-Corbito murder case, is abducted from his home in Indang, Cavite by armed men. De Pedro allegedly strangled Corbito before his corpse was set on fire along with Dacer.

31 March 2001: Former President Fidel V. Ramos presents himself to Justice Secretary Hernando Perez and volunteers to disclose any information he had on the killing of PR man Dacer.

Ramos accuses Estrada of being involved in the “tragic and murderous kidnapping.” Estrada denies the charge and says he is willing to accept invitations from the justice department to be able to help in the case.

4 April 2001: Wycoco announces that the following suspects in the Dacer-Corbito murder case are missing: 1) Jovencio Malabanan, 2) Renato Malabanan, 3) Margarito Cueno   4) William Lopez   5) Rommel Rollan.

All suspects are from Indang, Cavite and are assets of the PAOCTF during Estrada’s administration.

11 April 2001: Forensic pathologists from University of the Philippines confirm the death of Dacer. Dr. Raquel del Rosario-Fortun, leader of the forensics team, says that the remains found from the creek in Indang, Cavite were Dacer’s dental plates and Corbito’s family ring. 

Viña fails to report to his new assignment, Camp Crame. He is absent without official leave.

16 April 2001: Four suspects in the Dacer-Corbito case claims that Estrada ordered to kill Dacer through Chief Inspector Glenn Dumlao of the PAOCTF. They are saying that Estrada ordered seize of Dacer through Dumlao, bypassing Viña. The four usually receive orders from Viña, their immediate superior, not Dumlao. Viña, who was previously accused of being the brains behind the Dacer double murder case, turns over seven suspects to Philippine National Police Director General Leandro Mendoza during Lenten season. 

11 May 2001: The panel of prosecutors with the Manila Regional Trial Court (RTC) charged the following with the double muder of Dacer and Corbito: 1) Jimmy Lopez (detained), 2) Alex Diloy (detained), 3) William Lopez (detained), 4) SPO4 Marino Soberano.

Under custody of PNP-CIDG Camp Crame: 5) SPO3 Mauro Torres, 6) SPO3 Jose Escalante, 7) Crisostomo M. Purificacion, 8) Digo de Pedro, 9) Renato Malabanan, 10) Margarito Cueno, 11) Rommel Rollan.

The following are at large: 12) P/Supt. Glen Dumlao, 13) P/C Insp. Vicente Arnado, 14) P/Insp. Roberto Langcauon, 15) SPO4 Benjamin Taladua, 16) SPO1 Rolando Lacasandile, 17) SPO1 Mario Sarmiento, 18) SPO1 William Reed, 19) PO2 Thomas J. Sarmiento, 20) SPO1 Ruperto A. Nemeno;

21) John Does and James Does

14 May 2001: Lacson wins a seat in the Senate.

14 June 2001:

a.       Dumlao submits an affidavit, through his lawyer Atty. Rogelio Agoot.  Agoot says that Dumlao is “ready and willing to testify on it in any proceeding regardless of whoever will be implicated.” 

Contents of the affidavit recall the incident on November 24, 2000: 

“Dumlao described Aquino directing a ‘Special Operation’against Dacer. Aquino, Dumlao and Mancao discussed the special operation directed at Dacer in Aquino’s office. In November 2000, Mancao and Dumlao were together when Dumlao notified by text message from Aquino that “Delta (Dacer) had been taken. Conduct the T.I. (tactical interrogation), coordinate with 19. Do not bring along any one from Bicol.’ (Bicol was Dacer’s home region). When told about the text message from Aquino, Mancao told Dumlao, ‘Alright, go there. Update me of results of your T.I.’

b.      Acting upon Aquino’s and Mancao’s orders, Dumlao met with the officers who had abducted Dacer and Corbito. Dumlao then saw the two blindfolded men inside a van. Dumlao asked the man’s name, and the latter gave his name as ‘Mr. Bubby Dacer.’ After asking a series of question that Aquino had given him, Dumlao called Aquino who told him to ‘go back to base but secure any documents and give it to him (referring to Aquino).’ When told about the instruction of Aquino, Arnado told Dumlao, ‘Okay, Sir, I will take care of things here.’

c.      When Dacer’s vehicle was recovered at Maragondon, Cavite, Aquino called Dumlao about the matter and gave instruction to secure documents. Dumlao, however, later on, burned the documents upon being told by Mancao to dispose [of] the documents as it is too dangerous keeping them.” 

21 June 2001: More is revealed in Dumlao's sworn statement. He narrates that he was given an order by then chief of Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force (PAOCTF) Panfilo Lacson through Aquino to place Dacer under surveillance in January 1999. The affidavit states that Dumlao was given P20,000 to rent a room at the Manila Hotel so he could break in Dacer’s office, also in the building. Dumlao reveals that he was instructed to steal or destroy whatever documents he could find in the office. His superiors, according to the statement, were after documents pertaining to BW Resources, now under investigation for insider trading and stock manipulation at the PSE. Dacer reportedly got hold of the documents when Tan engaged in his services at the height of the probe being conducted by PSE and SEC. 

18 June 2001: Villanueva, one of the accused, filed a Motion for Reinvestigation asserting that he was mistakenly identified as a participant in the murder. He says that a certain SPO3 Allan Cadenilla Villanueva is the participant.

1 July 2001: Members of PAOCTF Cezar Mancao II and Michael Ray Aquino flee to Hong Kong and then to America.

2 August 2001: The NBI files a new complaint with the Department of Justice (DOJ) against a new suspect by name of P/Supt. Teofilo Viña, also a member of the PAOCTF.

17 September 2001: A Manifestation and Motion to Admit Amended Information was filed by the prosecution to discharge the following from accused to state witness: Jimmy and William Lopez, Alex Diloy and Glen Dumlao. The accused SPO3 Allan Villanueva will be replaced by P/Insp. Danilo Villanueva.

The following would be charged as additional suspects: P/Supt. Michael Ray Aquino, P/Supt. Cezar Mancao II and P/Sr. Supt. Teofilo Viña.

28 September 2001: The discharge of accused Dumlao, Diloy and Lopez brothers is denied by the Supreme Court.

1 October 2001: The Manila RTC denies the Motion to Admit Amended Information.

14 January 2002: The Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges recommends the dismissal of the request letter submitted by Atty. Jesus Crispin Remulla and Ronald Lumbao, spokesperson of the People's Movement Against Poverty (PMAP) for an investigation into the alleged involvement of Senator Renato Cayetano in the trading and manipulation of shares of stocks of BW Resource Corp.

7 January 2003: Teofilo Viña, one of the suspects, is gunned down in Tanza, Cavite by Medar Cruz. Motive of killing is not established. Cruz is a balikbayan from Virginia, United States.

3 May 2003: Dumlao issues an affidavit that states the government is pressuring him to pin down members of the opposition, noting Lacson, in the Dacer-Corbito double murder case. Dumlao then flees to America.

4 June 2003: Dante Tan flees to Australia.

6 June 2003: Australia’s Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock is saying that Australian police does not have the authority to stop Tan from leaving the Australia for they did not receive any extradition request from the Philippines. Australia’s Labor Party is questioning Ruddock’s intervention in the renewal of Tan’s visa in 2001 was linked to a A$10,000 donation he made to Ruddock’s election campaign previous month.

7 March 2005: Aquino is arrested for overstaying his tourist visa. 

5 October 2005: The Supreme Court discharges Dumlao as accused.

13 March 2006: The Court of Appeals affirms DOJ’s filing of criminal charges against Dante Tan.  

28 April 2006: The Manila Regional Trial court issues arrest warrants against Mancao and Aquino.

Mancao is arrested as a material witness against Aquino in an espionage case filed against the latter by the US government, but he is released on bail. Leandro Aragoncillo, former US Marine who was military aide to US vice presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, reportedly gave Aquino documents downloaded from FBI computers concerning observations on the political situation in Philippines.

20 December 2006: The Court of Appeals junks the petition for certiorari filed by the accused Aquino due to a technicality. The CA dismisses Aquino’s petition because it carries only the signature of Bayani Loste, his counsel.

17 July 2007: Aquino pleads guilty to unauthorized possession of US Department of Defense documents. These documents are to be allegedly transmitted to opposition leaders in the Philippines.

November 2007: Manila judge issues arrest warrant against Dumlao.

21 November 2007: The Pasig RTC absolves Dante Tan, Frederico Galang, Eduardo Lim Jr., Hermogenes Laddaran, Raul de Castro, Emmanuel Edward Co, Mario Juan and Jimmy Juan from criminal prosecution in relation to the BW Scandal in 1999.

3 April 2008: The Manila Regional Trial court accuses the following for the Dacer-Corbito double murder case: 1) PSSupt. Michael Ray B. Aquino, 2) PSSupt. Cezar O. Mancao II, 3) Teofilo Viña,, 4) SPO2 Allan Cadenillo Villanueva, 5) SPO4 Marino Soberano, 6) SPO3 Mauro Torres, 7) SPO3 Jose Escalante, 8) Crisostomo M. Purificacion, 9) Digo de Pedro, 10) Renato Malabanan, 11) Jovencio Malabanan, 12) Margarito Cueno, 13) Rommel Rollan, 14) PC/Insp. Vicente Arnado, 15) P/Insp. Roberto Langcauon, 16) SPO4 Benjamin Taladlua, 17) SPO1 Rolando Lacasandile, 18) SPO1 Mario Sarmiento, 19) SPO1 William Reed, 20) PO2 Thomas J. Sarmiento, Jr., 21) SPO1 Ruperto A. Nemenio.

23 April 2008: An electronic copy of the memo Dacer was supposed to give to Ramos in the night of his abduction surfaces under the name of F. Pancho Villaraza, a lawyer known to be a close adviser of President Arroyo. The memo contains proof of Tan transferring 300,000 shares of stocks to Sen. Lacson and three other parties.

14 July 2008: Presidential Management Staff Chief Cerge Remonde told Sen. Lacson that his position in public office does not guarantee him immunity from any criminal suit. 

August 2008: Prosecutors of the Dacer-Corbito case wrap up presenting their evidence along with testimonies of 12 witnesses. Ten accused and in custody begin to give their defense.

11 August 2008: Lacson says that the Office of the Ombudsman is investigating him. It started as a lifestyle check and slowly turned into a drive linking him to the murder of Dacer. 

24 September 2008: Philippine Government files extradition for Mancao.

Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Keene and Lurana S. Snow, a United States Magistrate Judge signed extradition complaint against Mancao.

20 November 2008: The US immigration agents arrest Dumlao outside his New York apartment. Mancao is arrested in Pembroke Pines, Florida.

Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez says that the Philippines requested for the extradition of Mancao and Dumlao.

US authorities, according to Gonzalez, have to determine whether Mancao and Dumlao have pending arrest warrants in the US. They will not be deported to the Philippines if they do.

22 November 2008: The US Department of Justice approves Philippine government’s request to extradite Aquino, Dumlao and Mancao to be tried for the murder of Dacer and Corbito.

24 November 2008: Schedule for Dumlao arraignment on December 5 is set.

Anti-crime advocates plead, “Don’t let the Bubby Dacer case go the way of the Aquino-Galman double murder case,” during a prayer vigil marking the eighth anniversary of the disappearance of Dacer and Corbito.  

1 December 2008: The US Department of Justice announces the extradition of Aquino, Dumlao and Mancao back to the Philippines.  

5 December 2008: Dumlao’s arraignment reset for December 8. 

8 December 2008: Dumlao’s arraignment reset for December 9.

9 December 2008: District Court Judge Katherine Tomlinson in New York rules to grant Philippine government’s request of extradition against Dumlao. 

10 December 2008: United States Magistrate Judge Tomlinson signs Dumlao's Certification of Extraditability and Order of Commitment.

11 December 2008: Dumlao weighs his options: whether he will appeal or not for his extradition to the Philippines.

27 December 2008: Justice Undersecretary Ricardo Blancaflor announces that a special task force formed by NBI agents will pick up Dumlao and Mancao once they are extradited. Blancaflor says that both might be back on March 2009.

3 February 2009: Roberto Nardoza, Spokesman of US Attorney’s Office in New York, announces Dumlao’s move to the Southern District of Florida to testify in Mancao’s extradition hearing.

10 February 2009: Snow sets a new extradition hearing date for Mancao originally scheduled February 12 to March 11, 11 a.m.

14 February 2009: Mancao signs an affidavit containing details about the abduction and murder of Dacer and Corbito in Broward County, Florida.

3 March 2009: Snow signs Mancao's Certification of Extraditability and Order of Commitment.

4 March 2009: Atty. Demetrio Custodio, lawyer of the Dacer family, says that Mancao is willing to tell all he knows about the Dacer and Corbito killings. 

Carina Dacer meets with Mancao at his extradition hearing in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Mancao agrees to reveal key suspects, including the mastermind, in her father’s murder.

5 March 2009: Carina Dacer accuses Lacson of obstruction of justice for keeping Mancao’s whereabouts hidden from the authorities. Carina says that Lacson talked to Mancao September 2008. Lacson says that his talk with Mancao in September 2008 was to only tell him to stick to the truth. Lacson adds that Major Gen. Romeo Prestoza made a phone call to Mancao offering to reinstate and promote Mancao in the PNP in exchange of implicating the senator in the Dacer-Corbito killings.

Custodio says that Mancao will no longer appeal his extradition. 

Justice Secretary Gonzalez says that Mancao can be state witness as long as he volunteers information about the mastermind in the Dacer-Corbito killings.

Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita says that Philippine authorities will provide security for Mancao. Ermita denies Lacson’s claim that Malacañang has been pressuring Mancao since 2008 to implicate Lacson since he is a part of the opposition.

6 March 2009: Lacson insists that he and Mancao were not involved in the Dacer-Cobito muder. 

Former president Estrada says he has nothing to do with the killings, recalling their friendship and strong ties.

Cabinet Secretary Silvestre Bello III tells media to stop speculating contents of Mancao’s affidavit.

Custodio says that Mancao will be extradited to the Philippines in less than three weeks. Mancao says that he wanted to shorten extradition process because he’s itching to authenticate his affidavit.

9 March 2009: Gonzalez says that Mancao’s affidavit mentioned names of government officials involved in the Dacer-Corbito double murder case. Gonzalez does not specify whether the named government officials are incumbent or not.

Secretary Gonzalez says that Mancao’s affidavit is now kept in a bank vault because he is worried his office might get ransacked. He says that it contains information that will unmask the mastermind of Dacer’s murder. Gonzalez says that Mancao is linking a lot of high-stature, powerful officials.  

13 March 2009: Sec. Gonzalez says that two civilians came forward claiming knowledge of the Dacer-Corbito double murder case. 

Department of Transportation and Communication Undersecretary Reynaldo Berroya, also PNP Intelligence Group at the time of Dacer’s murder, tells inquirer.net that Sen. Lacson’s camp was scared that Dacer would expose documents Lacson earning billions from stock market manipulation.

Berroya says that Dumlao told him before that the killing could not have taken place without the knowledge of Lacson. Berroya is saying that Estrada was not mentioned in the killings, and he does not think it is in his character to order a hit.

Berroya says that Dumlao told him that the former was also a target of an assassination plot in Capitol Golf Club in Quezon City last 2000; this information is confirmed by Sec. Gonzalez. Gonzalez claims this is in the affidavit of Mancao.

15 March 2009: Contents of Mancao’s affidavit are leaked by anonymous sources to Philippine Star columnist Tony Calvento. Mancao names Sen. Lacson as the mastermind of the Dacer-Corbito double murder case, Calvento says. The sources, according to Calvento, reveal that Mancao was present when then-chief of PNP and concurrently PAOCTF head Lacson gave hit order on Dacer to Aquino. Lacson, according to the sources, was looking for US properties of first gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo in hopes to discredit the administration.

Sec. Gonzalez says there is nothing in the affidavit of Mancao that will strongly point former president Estrada as the mastermind of the Dacer-Corbito murder case. 

16 March 2009: Gonzalez disputes the news report leaking the “contents” of Mancao's affidavit, “the affidavit of Mancao is with me and I know the contents and I can assure you that these statements about the order of Lacson to dig dirt on the First Gentleman never appear in the affidavit.” Gonzales says the reporter may be referring to a former affidavit issued by Mancao, not the one signed February 14. 

Dumlao claims that Berroya and former military intelligence officer Victor Corpuz forced him to write his 2003 affidavit linking Sen. Lacson to the double murder case.

17 March 2009: Gonzalez announces that Dumlao is scheduled to be extradited to the Philippines on or before March 19, 2009. 

Calvento says he will resign if his report is proven wrong. Dacer's daughter Carina is saying that the report on Mancao's affidavit is accurate.

18 March 2009: Mancao urges the government to declare him state witness and ensure his protection. His attorney refuses to reveal the contents of his affidavit as Mancao wants the public to wait for his statement. 

Dacer family lawyer Atty. Demetrio Custodio, who claims to have seen Mancao's affidavit, tells the press that it jibes with the contents of Dumlao's affidavit. Custodio says the Dacer family is studying their options whether to reopen the case or file an entirely new case.

Department of Justice State Prosecutor Phillip Kimpo clarifies that Dumlao issued three affidavits: 1) Linking Aquino, Mancao and other high officials with the name "71" to the double murder case, 2) In 2003, claimed that he was forced to link Sen. Lacson to the murder case, and 3) the latest one, which was executed while his extradition was already being processed, affirms the authenticity of his first affidavit.

19 March 2009: Dumlao cancels his flight back to Manila. NBI agents in the Los Angeles airport assigned to bring him back report to Sec. Gonzalez that Dumlao will petition for his right to the writ of habeas corpus and the writ of injunction. Gonzalez suspects a conspiracy behind Dumlao's petition against his extradition. “I will be forced to release Mancao's statement if this continues,” Gonzalez said.

20 March 2009: Dumlao's lawyer Felix Vinluan says in a radio interview with Ted Failon that the reason for Dumlao's petition against his extradition was that he was tortured to implicate Sen. Lacson and former president Estrada

Philippine Daily Inquirer releases contents of Mancao's affidavit signed February 14, 2009 from a government official who does not want to be named. In another article, a letter was found in Dacer’s office, written on Malacañang letterhead and addressed to Tan, demanding Tan to turnover Estrada's BW stocks amounting to P500 million. 

Mancao states in his affidavit that in the early part of 2000, he found out that Aquino was utilizing some of his personnel in PAOCTF task force Luzon for Aquino’s “special operations,” pertaining to operations that do not follow normal channels of command, without his knowledge. Dacer, whom they referred to as “DELTA,” was the target of the special operations.

Mancao says Aquino told him that the special operations were “approved and cleared by Lacson and Malacañang itself.” He claims in the affidavit that Lacson gave him direct orders to cover up the murder immediate after Dacer and Corbito were killed.

Senator Lacson maintains that he does not have anything to do with the Dacer-Corbito double murder case. He says it was Malacañang frame-up.

Other contents of Mancao’s affidavit:

“After winning the election as senator of the Republic of the Philippines in the May 2001 elections, LACSON called AQUINO and myself to a meeting in a house somewhere in Greenhills, San Juan, Metro Manila. In that meeting, LACSON instructed both of us to leave the country since the new administration would surely go after us and link us in the DACER-CORBITO double murder case, among others, in order to destroy his reputation and presidential ambition. He assured us that he will take care of both of us and will continue to give us our monthly allowance. I can vividly remember LACSON’S words: ‘Kailangang umalis na kayo sa bansa dahil si Glenn nagbigay na ng statement, and Kuratong Baleleng case ay binuhay, at posibleng gagawa yan ng iba pang mga kaso. Huwag kayong mag-alala, ako ang bahala sa inyo.’ (You need to leave the country because Glenn already gave a statement, and the Kuratong Baleleng case is revived, and it is possible that they will file more cases. Don’t worry, I will have you covered.) At that time, the burnt remains and belongings of DACER and CORBITO had been recovered from a creek somewhere in Indang, Cavite; some of the perpetrators had even confessed to the killing; and the case was already being investigated by the Department of Justice.”

“On July 1, 2001, I followed LACSON’s instructions for me to leave the country for the United States. I rendezvous with AQUINO in Hong Kong and from there we proceeded to the United States via San Francisco. LACSON made arrangements for our stay at Harrold Hicks’ friend’s house in Daly City; Hicks is a former enlisted man who worked under LACSON. However, before I left the country, I was made to sign a Counter-Affidavit in the then pending preliminary investigation concerning the abduction and death of DACER and CORBITO before the Department of Justice. The Counter-Affidavit contained for the most part, strong denials of my supposed knowledge or participation in the DACER-CORBITO operations as narrated by DUMLAO in a handwritten affidavit. I was constrained to sign the same despite knowing that some of the allegations were actually true, in order to save my neck and in the hope that I will be exonerated therefrom.”

“In September 2001, I decided to settle in the state of Florida, while AQUINO settled in the state of New Jersey. I have lived in Florida since then and never went back to the Philippines. In the meanwhile, LACSON repeatedly traveled to the U.S. from October 2001 up to September 2003 and met with us in all of these occasions; he also did not fail to reimburse our plane fares and other expenses.”

Former president Estrada, referred to as “BIGOTE” in Mancao’s affidavit and was “irked” by Dacer, says that Mancao’s statement is really an attempt to discredit him. In an interview on ANC’s On the Scene, Estrada says “The government is afraid of my continued popularity. Hindi pa nga ako nagdi-deklara na tatakbo ako para sa pagkapresidente sa 2010, takot na sila. (I have not yet declared if I am running for president in 2010, they are already afraid.)”

24 March 2009: Carina Dacer, daughter of Dacer, says that Lacson sent her a text message saying he is not involved in the murder of Bubby Dacer. “A text message is not a signed affidavit,” she says. Carina tells government officials to stop making the death of his father about the presidential race in 2010.

Dumlao’s lawyer Vinluan says that the DOJ had misinterpreted the SC decision on October 5, 2005 that excluded Dumlao as an accused.

Press Secretary Cerge Remonde says that it was intriguing how Dumlao managed to post a $100,000 when he had no means to raise the money on his own.

The Dacer family files a formal complaint against Sen. Lacson for the murders of Dacer and Corbito. Dacer’s four daughters execute an affidavit directly accusing Lacson of masterminding the killings. Sen. Lacson reiterates that he had nothing to do with the killings of Dacer and Corbito.

31 March 2009: Vicente Arnado, former police chief inspector of the defunct PAOCTF and also a suspect in the Dacer-Corbito murder case, is still hiding in the US and has yet to be arrested, unlike Mancao, Dumlao and Aquino. DOJ will soon move for the arrest and extradition of Arnado.

13 April 2009: The Court of Appeals orders the criminal prosecution of Dante Tan, Frederico Galang, Eduardo Lim Jr., Hermogenes Laddaran, Raul de Castro, Emmanuel Edward Co, Mario Juan and Jimmy Juan for the insider trading and stock price manipulation of BW Resources Corp. in 1999.

22 April 2009: The Supreme Court rules that the BW criminal charge against Tan to proceed. Justice Minita V. Chico-Nazario penned the decision to uphold the CA ruling to reinstate criminal case no. 119830 against Tan.

3 June 2009: Mancao is turned over to NBI officials at the Los Angeles International Airport. Mancao flies back to Manila via Philippine Airlines flight number PR 103.

4 June 2009: Mancao is back in Manila.

The Rizal Day bombings rocked Metro Manila on 30 December 2000. Bombs exploded in five separate places almost simultaneously, claiming lives of at least 22 persons and injuring more than a hundred.

The Erap impeachment trial was on an 11-day Christmas break and would resume in 3 days. When it adjourned on 22 December 2000, the Senate Tribunal heard the testimony of Equitable-PCI Bank Senior Vice President Clarissa Ocampo. She told the court that Erap on February 9, 1999, signed as “Jose Velarde” on documents related to the opening of a trust account with her bank in her presence.

This book has deemed it important to mention the Dacer-Corbito murders and the Rizal Day bombings because madness of this kind, claiming even more innocent lives, would continue to rock the GMA government.

Some of the publicized cases included the 4 March 2003 Davao Airport bombing that killed 21 people and injured more than a hundred more people; the 2 April 2003 Sasa Wharf, also in Davao City, bombing, killing 16 and injuring 46 people; the 19 October 2007 Glorietta 2 in Makati City bombing, killing 11 and injuring more than a hundred people; the 13 November 2007 Batasan Pambansa bombing that killed 6 and injured 12 people.

While government had been quick to tag Muslim radicals as suspects in these and many other atrocities, others believed, as discussed earlier, that these seemingly false-flag incidents were carried out to divert media and public attention from controversies in which government officials were involved.

The GMA government had proven itself to be as scandal-ridden as the one it succeeded; it hobbled under the weight of--to name a few examples--the fertilizer fund scam, the “Hello Garci” scandal, the NBN-ZTE bribery scandal, among other controversies.

Attempts to impeach GMA became a hobby and Malacañang, when facing really serious threats, variably responded with either bribe offers of out-sized congressional pork barrel funds, if not outright cash, or counter threats.

In October 2007, then Pampanga Governor Ed Panlilio said he received a bag containing P500,000 after he attended a meeting in Malacañang.

On August 18, 2003, Ping Lacson, who was now Senator of the Philippines, accused in a privilege speech then First Gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo “of money laundering for supposedly siphoning off at least P321 million in campaign funds and contributions to a secret bank account under the fictitious name Jose Pidal and three other accounts using the names of his aides.”

Lacson went into hiding in January 2010 before an arrest warrant--having been charged as mastermind of the Dacer-Corbito murders--could be issued to him. All throughout, the senator had insisted he was innocent of the charge and maintained that political harassment by the GMA government was his main reason for hiding.

To be fair, crime and corruption have not been a monopoly of the Erap and GMA governments.[2] If an evolution of government dysfunctions could be traced, one would probably see them in times as old as the Magdalo and Katipunan conflicts.  Walden Bello, in a February 2001 essay that broke down what was in store of the GMA presidency, took note of the creeping corruption that debased government’s capacity for checking crime. Excerpts:

“Also volatile in its consequences was the massive expansion of the security forces amid economic stagnation. The result was the proliferation of thousands of low-paid condottieri who hired themselves out to local and national politicians. By the end of the Marcos regime, not a few officers had discovered that their command over men and firepower could be translated into successful entrepreneurship in the form of kidnapping the rich--especially rich Chinese--for ransom. Why, they reasoned, should this extremely profitable business be left to petty gangsters? Indeed, when regular gangsters sought to organize independently of the military and police, they found out the hard way that the men in uniform would brook no competition. Some observers contend that this was the significance of the total liquidation of a Jesse James-like outfit, the Kuratong Baleleng Gang, while under government custody in 1995, an operation carried out by security elites closely associated with then-Vice President Estrada.

“From a sociological point of view, the most interesting item to come out of the revelations of Singson is that the main project of the Estrada administration was to centralize crime under the presidency. Under Estrada, the most profitable criminal activities, like jueteng, were to be rationalized, with a bureaucracy stretching from the president to the smallest jueteng collector, paralleling and intertwining at key points with the formal hierarchy of government. What was exposed in the jueteng scandal was probably only the tip of the iceberg. Many Filipinos are convinced that the worlds of prostitution, drugs and kidnapping were on their way to becoming equally centralized. Had the Estrada project not been disrupted, the president would have become the apex of both the state and the underworld. This was the real “Erap Revolution” –and Filipinos, particularly the middle class, had thought the man was stupid!

“The state-mafia nexus is the reason that many people in this country who felt Estrada should go expressed hesitations when it came to the question of succession. At the onset of the current crisis, Vice President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo left the president's Cabinet and called for Estrada's resignation. She did not, however, meet with enthusiastic support. The biggest apprehension stemmed from her political and personal ties to Bong Pineda, one of the country's top gambling lords, from whom Singson collected jueteng proceeds meant for Estrada. In fact, she was the main sponsor at the wedding of one of Pineda's children, and such ritual kinship in this country bespeaks close personal ties. Arroyo was also accused, like Estrada, of concealing her net worth by not declaring her ownership of property in San Francisco worth $4.6 million. So, not surprisingly, many feared that the country would be getting rid of Estrada only to deliver the presidency to somebody who might be equally compromised with crime.”




[1] Source: https://youtu.be/PQdHzhseX0o

[2] For example, the administration that succeeded GMA’s, under the leadership of President Benigno Aquino III, was also graft and scandal ridden, but any reference to it, unless related to the main issue which Chavit brought up against Erap, should be out of this book’s reach.


No comments:

Post a Comment

The Chavit Singson Story

Photo credit: Chavit Singson S omewhere in the dense text of the 2007 Sandiganbayan decision on the plunder case agai...